Jay Fergusonjay@deepcreekvacations.com301-501-0420
Menu

Potential developers should proceed with percolation tests pronto

Garrett County commissioners point to grandfathering provisions

Elaine Blaisdell Cumberland Times-News

— OAKLAND — Recently passed legislation limiting septic systems for housing projects in Maryland contains grandfathering provisions, and Garrett County leaders have suggested that property owners take advantage of them.

Time is running out for potential developers, with the first step in the process a percolation test.

“If you have your application in to the Environmental Health Department by July, that would give you some grandfather rights to go ahead and create a subdivision that would be larger than seven lots, which would be considered a major subdivision,” said John Nelson, director of the Department of Planning and Land Development, during a recent commission meeting.

As soon as percolation test results are approved, property owners have 18 months until preliminary application can be made for subdivision plat approval, according Nelson.

“If property owners make application by July 1, 2012, we stand ready to do the necessary soil and percolation tests to meet the required plat approval deadlines,” said Health Officer Rodney Glotfelty in a news release.

It is important to have the application for the major subdivisions in the hands of the proper officials prior to the deadline, according to Glotfelty.

If application for the percolation test is not made by July 1, preliminary plans for a major subdivision that is utilizing an on-site sewage disposal system must be turned into the Department of Planning and Land Development by Oct. 1. These plans must be in by Oct. 1 to have exemptions for more than seven lots, according to Nelson.

Oct. 1, 2016, is the date to have subdivision preliminary plan approval from the county’s planning commission, for major subdivision utilizing an on-site sewage disposal system, according to the news release.

The Sustainable Growth and Agricultural Preservation Act of 2012 (Senate Bill 236), which was passed by the Maryland General Assembly, amends both Maryland health and land planning statutes, according to a county news release.

Nelson described the intent of SB 236, which is essentially a spetic bill.

“The intent of the bill is to minimize the number of new housing starts that will be allowed on septic systems,” said Nelson, “It really affects primarly rural counties more so than metropolitan counties where they do have infrastructure, water, sewer and those types of amenities.”

Areas currently served by public sewer are not impacted by this bill, according to Nelson. Instead, the bill will affect areas that are not currently served and planned areas.

The septic bill was based on recommendations from the governor’s Task Force on Sustainable Growth and Wastewater Disposal to minimize the amount of harmful nitrogen loads from septic systems that enter the Chesapeake Bay watershed, according to a news release. The Maryland Department of the Environment was required to come up with regulations for nitrogen offsets, according to Nelson. Currently, the septic systems leach out higher levels of nitrogen than are typically allowed on any public sewer system.

“If you are going to be creating a subdivision even a minor subdivision there will be nutrient requirements by MDE,” said Nelson. “What that means is your spetic systems are going to have to be designed as such, that they will virtually take out all nitrogen from the systems. We don’t know what those design systems are going to be it’s to premature.”

Nelson noted that the design systems are going to be more expensive and that MDE has until then end of the calendar year to come up with the regulations for the offsets of nitrogen.

Contact Elaine Blaisdell at eblaisdell@times-news.com

More here.

Search real estate for sale at Deep Creek Lake & Garrett County

Buying or selling real estate in Garrett County or Deep Creek Lake, Maryland? Call Jay Ferguson of Railey Realty for all of your real estate needs! I take great pride in referrals, and I assure you, I will take great care of your friends, family & colleagues!

877-563-5350 – toll free

Drafts address land-use in Garrett County

‘Clustering’ now included as an option

Megan Miller
Cumberland Times-News

OAKLAND — A second round of draft updates to Garrett County land ordinances makes more concessions for development and places fewer restrictions on land use, after public protests caused officials to rethink stricter regulations in a previous draft.

The long process of updating the planning and land development ordinances entered a new phase last week with the release of revised drafts for public review. The documents — drafts of the subdivision ordinance, sensitive areas ordinance and Deep Creek watershed zoning ordinance — contain a second round of changes, following the first changes and public comment period that took place in the fall.

The first versions spurred some public uproar over a provision that would affect the development of rural resource and agricultural resource land. That provision would have required at least 66 percent of subdivision land parcels in those areas to be set aside as “resource parcels,” or open land.

The provisions do not affect the entire county, but only areas specifically designated “agricultural resource” and “rural resource.” However, those two areas do span large portions of the county.

The resource parcel stipulation was intended to protect areas of forest, natural resources and farmland from development, according to its language. It would have prevented sprawling development by requiring the majority of a parcel to be set aside, and clustering development onto lots of no minimum size on one-third of the parcel.

“It’s trying to preserve a portion of the land to keep it as productive farmland or productive timberland,” said John Nelson, director of planning and land development. “That’s the real purpose of the clustering. What we’re saying is, create smaller lots but save a portion of the land. Maybe it would belong to a homeowners association, and they could lease it as a farm.”

But many farmers and other landowners spoke out against the measure, arguing that it directly or indirectly placed too many restrictions on how the land could be used.

Paul Miller, president of the Garrett County Farm Bureau board of directors, said his organization objected because they saw the clustering requirement as an infringement on private property rights, affecting the way landowners could sell their land. It could also have driven down property values by restricting potential land uses, he said.

Due to those and other public objections, the clustering requirement has been removed in the latest draft, Nelson said. Instead, the document includes clustering as an option, and contains incentives to attempt to encourage that type of development, he explained.

Miller said the latest draft of the ordinance has addressed his concerns.

“If it holds as it is, we’re satisfied,” he said.

A provision in the first draft of the updated Deep Creek watershed zoning ordinance also caused a stir because it would have put strict requirements on development on crests and ridge lines visible from the surface or shoreline of the lake. The proposed changes also would have required trees to be planted between structures and the lake to screen them from view.

“About four years ago we had held public meetings about people’s views on changes and development in the county,” Nelson said. “The development that is occurring on the ridge lines around the lake was the No. 1 response. People were worried about the development taking away from the natural scenic beauty of those ridges.”

But the strict requirements didn’t sit well with people specifically interested in those properties for the development potential and unobstructed lake views. In the latest draft, the provision has been changed to require only that trees be planted around the sides and rear of new structures to help them blend into the surrounding vegetation, Nelson explained. No trees are required for the front, or lake-facing side.

The county planning commission has been working on the ordinance updates since spring 2009, mainly because state law requires the ordinances to be adjusted to remain consistent with changes to the county comprehensive plan adopted in 2008, according to Nelson.

A public hearing on the latest versions of the ordinances will be held in coming weeks, though nothing has been scheduled yet.

Updated versions of the ordinance drafts and maps are available online on the county Web site at. www.garrettcounty.org

If you are thinking of buying or selling real estate in Garrett County or Deep Creek Lake, Maryland, call Jay Ferguson of Long & Foster Real Estate for all of your real estate needs! 877-563-5350