“Sometimes people forget Deep Creek Lake was built to produce electricity,” remarked Dustin Droege, the director of operations at Brookfield Renewable US, the entity responsible for overseeing the dam that powers the region.
Indeed, Deep Creek Lake’s hydroelectric generation station, constructed nearly a century ago, stands as a testament to a bygone era of energy innovation. Permitted by the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE), the dam has been a vital source of power for the area.
However, a recent development threatens to alter the dam’s operational landscape. Senate Bill 837, spearheaded by Sen. Mike McKay and Del. Jim Hinebaugh, aims to impose restrictions on the dam’s functioning. The legislation proposes periodic lowering of the lake’s water levels to facilitate studies on invasive plant species and sedimentation between November 30 and February 28.
“If we can’t operate, then we don’t have a business,” Droege emphasized, underscoring the potential ramifications of the proposed bill.
At the heart of the matter lies a clash between environmental stewardship and economic interests. Proponents argue that the proposed studies are essential for safeguarding the lake’s ecosystem, while opponents, including Brookfield Renewable US, contend that the bill jeopardizes their ability to meet consumer demand and fulfill public obligations.
Central to the debate is the contention that the proposed legislation circumvents established regulatory processes. Brookfield Renewable US points to the rigorous permitting procedure overseen by the MDE, which involves stakeholder engagement and public input. The company insists that existing frameworks are sufficient for addressing environmental concerns without resorting to legislative mandates.
Jess Whittemore, a longtime resident and advocate for the Youghiogheny River, expressed surprise and dismay at the lack of consultation with stakeholders impacted by the proposed bill. As a liaison for Friendsville, a town that thrives on tourism generated by whitewater rafting enthusiasts, Whittemore voiced concerns about the potential economic repercussions of altering the lake’s water levels.
Indeed, the economic ripple effects extend beyond Deep Creek Lake, permeating local businesses and communities that rely on tourism revenue. Kim Spear, who has witnessed the influx of visitors to Friendsville’s liquor store during whitewater season, echoed sentiments of apprehension regarding the bill’s potential impact on the town’s prosperity.
Roger Zbel, representing commercial outfitters on the Upper Youghiogheny River, penned a letter to Sen. McKay highlighting the adverse effects of prolonged lake drawdowns on rafting, whitewater activities, and fisheries. His concerns mirror those of many stakeholders who fear the unintended consequences of hasty legislative action.
As the legislative debate unfolds, voices of dissent grow louder, questioning the origin and implications of SB 837. John Bambacus, a former state senator and advocate for transparent governance, underscored the need for inclusivity in policy discussions, lamenting the exclusion of affected parties from the decision-making process.
Ultimately, the fate of Deep Creek Lake hangs in the balance as policymakers grapple with competing interests. In a landscape where environmental preservation collides with economic imperatives, finding common ground remains elusive. As the legislative process unfolds, one thing remains certain: the future of Deep Creek Lake hinges on the delicate balance between progress and preservation.
for more information Bill to lower Deep Creek Lake faces opposition | Local News | times-news.com
